“We note that ‘Inc’ (Unconscious) does not coincide with one’s removed; it remains correct to assert that everything removed is ‘inc’(unconscious), but not that every ‘Inc’ (Unconscious) is removed. Even a portion of one’s own ‘I’, a portion God knows how important, can be, and indeed is, ‘inc’(unconscious).”[1]

“… there’s no significant that is supported except in the reference to another significant : up to observe, extreme, that there is no existing language for which the question arises of its insufficiency to cover the field of meanings, given that an effect of its existence as a language is to respond to all its needs.”[2]

Memory of one’s experience cannot be surrogated by an offer of  classification, albeit significant it can be : but it is especially in the experience of satisfaction – thinking and affection of satisfaction and conclusion – that there is resistance[3] to that individual laboratory which is one’s own memory, whose one’s body is the representative, and that one’s brain can draw on, when corrected one’s renunciation and its fraud.

Marina Bilotta Membretti / Cernusco sul Naviglio – May 1, 2024

[1] Cited from : ‘Coscienza e inconscio’ in ‘L’Io e l’Es’, S. Freud (1923) – OSF Vol. 9 Bollati Boringhieri, pp.480-481.

[2] Cited from : ‘Jacques Lacan. Scritti’ Vol. I, a cura di Giacomo B. Contri – Giulio Einaudi Editore SpA (2002), p.492

[3] “Law is one’s thinking – thinking ‘on’ nature – that has been made memory on a memory already formed by the first experience of satisfaction through Another one. It is conscience outlawed, i.e. outside this law, not in compliance with the law, that opposes one’s memory, and such a conscience is all the more in opposition to the law-memory the more Power’s ambition becomes over one’s law-memory.” Cited from : ‘Inconscio. Precisazione’ in ‘Il pensiero di natura. Dalla psicoanalisi al pensiero giuridico’, by Giacomo B. Contri SIC Edizioni (1998), p.166