Thinking as a partner

A quiet signal from thinking.

“…The speaker (Freud, editor’s note) spoke of two facts demonstrating that within ‘I’, too, there is an unconscious which behaves dynamically in the exact same manner as the removed unconscious: these are a resistance originating from ‘I’ during the course of analysis and an unconscious sense of guilt.”

To benefit from one’s calling[1]/82.

Freud points out in the patient that there is some thinking as a resistance which, however, has nothing to do with conscience, because conscience has neither removed the unconscious nor thrown this into crisis. Is it a matter of a 'not yet'? We do not know.

What is certain is that conscience hesitates to remove the unconscious—perhaps conscience has not even noticed unconscious.

Therefore, this unconscious remains an available raw material, coming, moreover, from an unexpected orebody.

Marina Bilotta Membretti/ Cernusco sul Naviglio – October 5, 2026

TutorSalus.net – Freudian journalism

Original painting by Gianni Russomando.[2]

[1]  www.tutorsalus.net/index.php/en/pensare-da-partner-2/358-psychoanalyst-and-profession-1

[2] Gianni Russomando : born in Vercelli (1956), graduated at the ‘Istituto di Belle Arti di Vercelli’, he describes himself as an ‘amanuense’ (medieval hand-painter) and far from expositions and competitions.

ex-citement: other than desire.

To benefit from one’s calling[1]/81.

It is the confession of a real 'urge'[2]—there is an other in reality who makes me want it.

Consequently I am the 'source'[3], and judge whether it is ‘urge’ or not: other than desire!

Then, it is intellectual honesty indeed, even not harmful: crystal clear for AI.

Marina Bilotta Membretti, Cernusco sul Naviglio 17 settembre 2026

TutorSalus.net – Giornalismo freudiano

[1]  www.tutorsalus.net/index.php/en/pensare-da-partner-2/358-psychoanalyst-and-profession-1

[2] “We can now take a close look at some terms we used when we talk about the issue of ‘urge’, for example ‘push’, ‘goal’, ‘object’, ‘source’ of the urge.” Cited from ’Pulsioni e loro destini’ pp. 32-34 in ‘Scritti metapsicologici’, S. Freud (1915-1917) Biblioteca Bollati Boringhieri (2011).

[3] See pp. 14-15; pp. 24-27; p. 59; pp. 156-161 in ‘Il pensiero di natura. Dalla psicoanalisi al pensiero giuridico, Giacomo B. Contri SIC Edizioni (1998).

word and non word.

To benefit from one’s calling[1] / 80.

An admission can even be a non-word, which doesn’t fall if it is picked up - by noting down its date and time, that is. A ‘lapsus’ offers us an admission, and even rejecting a ‘lapsus’ offers us an admission: there is, in fact, a listener within the person who pronounced it.

We listen in silence, there is no other way; yet not necessarily in the silence a word is pronounced.

It is a matter of a different position, and of a non-simultaneity.

Marina Bilotta Membretti/ Cernusco sul Naviglio - July 16, 2026

TutorSalus.net - Freudian journalism

[1] www.tutorsalus.net/index.php/en/pensare-da-partner-2/358-psychoanalyst-and-profession-1

the access to reality is not automatic.

 To benefit from one’s calling[1] / 79.

“There are therefore my three concluding chapters: Law, Science, Reliability”[2].

I repeat that access to reality, to which even a newborn can testify, is not automatic: this is the first Law, and in the possible – desirable – access, there is no ontologism, nor ontology.

So much so that even to hinder this access can be recorded: because it is exclusively from this access that the principle of pleasure originates, and from here every subsequent psychic occurrence, as a profit of individual work.

In psychoanalysis, this work looks enters the analytical, but it constantly draws from the memory of one's own individual work, and it could not be otherwise.

That is why a psychoanalyst.

Marina Bilotta Membretti/ Cernusco sul Naviglio – July 7, 2026

TutorSalus.net - Freudian journalism

[1] www.tutorsalus.net/index.php/en/pensare-da-partner-2/358-psychoanalyst-and-profession-1

[2] Cited from incipit ‘Tre capitoli’ 7 gennaio 2022, Contribution by Giacomo B. Contri to the Symposium ‘Amore’ 2021 – 2022 organized by ‘Società Amici del pensiero Sigmund Freud’, Milan.